Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Fouladi Dehaghi B, Jahanifard E, Farshadzadeh Z, Abbasi Montazeri E, Maraghi E, Babaei Heydarabadi A. Exploring the Important elements in the evaluation of the thesis supervisor of medical students: A qualitative research. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2021; 21 :359-369
URL: http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-5295-en.html
URL: http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-5295-en.html
Behzad Fouladi Dehaghi 
, Elham Jahanifard 
, Zahra Farshadzadeh , Effat Abbasi Montazeri , Elham Maraghi , Akbar Babaei Heydarabadi *
, Elham Jahanifard , Zahra Farshadzadeh , Effat Abbasi Montazeri , Elham Maraghi , Akbar Babaei Heydarabadi *
Assistant Professor, Department of Health Education & Health Promotion, school of public health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. , babaeinmz2056@gmail.com
Abstract: (977 Views)
Introduction: Introduction: The evaluation of the student dissertation supervisor is one of the important issues in improving the scientific and research level of students that has received less attention. Therefore, this study endeavored to identify the components of evaluation instruments of medical students' dissertation supervisors.
Methods: This study was conducted with a qualitative approach and conventional content analysis method in the academic year 2021 in Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences. After reviewing the available articles and texts, the interview guide questions in a group discussion session with the participation of the research team; designed. Data were collected through structured interviews (electronically) and group discussion, and by purposeful sampling of stakeholders. The proposed Lundman and Graneheim steps were employed to analyze the data.
Results: In this study, 22 faculty members and 10 students participated, which was collected from data analysis; 260 initial codes were obtained and after the final analysis in group discussion sessions, 50 codes were classified into three categories. Nine codes were obtained in the category of Supervisor Capacity, 15 codes in the category of General Ethics, and 26 codes in the category of Professional Ethics.
Conclusion: In this study, 50 major factors were identified as elements and components of the evaluation instruments of the student's dissertation supervisor that can be used in the evaluation process of professors.
Methods: This study was conducted with a qualitative approach and conventional content analysis method in the academic year 2021 in Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences. After reviewing the available articles and texts, the interview guide questions in a group discussion session with the participation of the research team; designed. Data were collected through structured interviews (electronically) and group discussion, and by purposeful sampling of stakeholders. The proposed Lundman and Graneheim steps were employed to analyze the data.
Results: In this study, 22 faculty members and 10 students participated, which was collected from data analysis; 260 initial codes were obtained and after the final analysis in group discussion sessions, 50 codes were classified into three categories. Nine codes were obtained in the category of Supervisor Capacity, 15 codes in the category of General Ethics, and 26 codes in the category of Professional Ethics.
Conclusion: In this study, 50 major factors were identified as elements and components of the evaluation instruments of the student's dissertation supervisor that can be used in the evaluation process of professors.
Type of Study: Original research article |
Subject:
Teacher Evaluation
Received: 2021/06/27 | Accepted: 2021/08/25 | Published: 2021/04/4 | ePublished: 2021/04/4
Received: 2021/06/27 | Accepted: 2021/08/25 | Published: 2021/04/4 | ePublished: 2021/04/4
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
