Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Najimi A, Shafiee F, Haghani F. Evaluation of Self-care Diabet Program in Health System based on CIPP Evaluation Model. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2019; 19 :472-482
URL: http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-4923-en.html
URL: http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-4923-en.html
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , fariba.haghani@gmail.com
Abstract: (136762 Views)
Introduction: It is possible to formulate and execute programs, to achieve ideals and goal using evaluation. In reality, evaluation of a self-care education program can determine the degree of adaptation of the program and identify effective factors in improving the program. The aim of this study was to investigate the evaluation of the self-cared educational program of diabetes type II based on the CIPP(Context,Input, Process,Product) evaluation model in the city of Mobarakeh in 2018.
Methods: This study is descriptive and program evaluation based on the CIPP evaluation model. Information was collected in a cross-sectional fashion. Eighty one males and females participated in this study by the census method included the head of health center in the city, an expert in controlling diseases, an expert in charge of non-capture diseases of the city, health care observers in centers and health bases. In order to collect information, CIPP evaluation information questionnaires developed by the researchers. The gathered data were analyzed both descriptively and inferentially using chi squre tests, independent t-tests and ANOVA tests. Data was finally analyzed by SPSS version 22
Results: The results of this study based on CIPP evaluation model showed that the average of evaluation scores were like these: In the domains of Context (4/32±0/47), Input (3/87±0/35) were significantly lower than the average, process (4/17±0/34), and though the mean score of input (4/41±0/40) was higher (p<0/05). The results revealed that the Mean Score based on CIPP evaluation model in three domains including context, process and output is desirable and input is semi-desirable.
Conclusion: Based on the evaluation results, it is recommended to evaluate the program regularly and identify the strengths and weaknesses of the program
Methods: This study is descriptive and program evaluation based on the CIPP evaluation model. Information was collected in a cross-sectional fashion. Eighty one males and females participated in this study by the census method included the head of health center in the city, an expert in controlling diseases, an expert in charge of non-capture diseases of the city, health care observers in centers and health bases. In order to collect information, CIPP evaluation information questionnaires developed by the researchers. The gathered data were analyzed both descriptively and inferentially using chi squre tests, independent t-tests and ANOVA tests. Data was finally analyzed by SPSS version 22
Results: The results of this study based on CIPP evaluation model showed that the average of evaluation scores were like these: In the domains of Context (4/32±0/47), Input (3/87±0/35) were significantly lower than the average, process (4/17±0/34), and though the mean score of input (4/41±0/40) was higher (p<0/05). The results revealed that the Mean Score based on CIPP evaluation model in three domains including context, process and output is desirable and input is semi-desirable.
Conclusion: Based on the evaluation results, it is recommended to evaluate the program regularly and identify the strengths and weaknesses of the program
Type of Study: Original research article |
Subject:
Program Evaluation
Received: 2019/05/30 | Accepted: 2019/09/11 | Published: 2019/04/15 | ePublished: 2019/04/15
Received: 2019/05/30 | Accepted: 2019/09/11 | Published: 2019/04/15 | ePublished: 2019/04/15
پرسشنامه مطالعه [PDF 93 KB] (127 Download)
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
